VVPAT faulty, says ex-DGP

"I asked the presiding officer to cancel my vote. He said the provision of cancelling his vote was not available," he said. Deka was the first voter at the booth.He said the presiding officer had told him that there was a provision of "challenging" for which he would have to pay Rs 2. "He (presiding officer) said based on my complaint, an inquiry will be instituted. If the inquiry finds I had filed a wrong complaint, there will be criminal liability that would fetch a fine of Rs 10,000 along with a jail term," he said.Deka, who did not challenge, said he was convinced that problems occurred in EVM and VVPAT machines. "I think the old system of ballot paper was better," he said, adding that by putting the liability on voters, the Election Commission was dissuading the electorates.Sahu said if Deka had given his complaint in writing, he would have to cast his vote in front of all officials of the polling station to show he was right. DailyhuntDisclaimer: This story is auto-aggregated by a computer program and has not been created or edited by Dailyhunt. Publisher: The Telegraphhttps://in.usgbc.org/people/cersi-lanister/0011312250

https://www.elementownersclub.com/forums/member.php?u=174953