Everybody can sympathize with Saroo. We've all, as kids, felt that snapshot of frenzy when isolated from our folks or a more seasoned kin at a bustling business sector or travel center.
For me, it was an open pool. Also, as grown-ups we've all spent whole evenings, eyes smoldering, click-click-tapping on the web to discover something we know we'll in the long run find, simply one more moment, it's going to be the following one, it's going to be the following one.
Obviously for Saroo (played by Sunny Pawar as a tyke and Dev Patel as a grown-up) what's in question is a great deal more decisive, yet the all inclusiveness of the fundamental feeling, opened up to stratospheric levels, is the thing that makes Lion such a striking film.
I knew precisely what I was in for going into this photo, yet at the same time rose a blubbery wreckage, humors spouting from my nasolacrimal conduits with tidal drive. In the event that this kind of exceptional, passionate association isn't what's meriting somewhat gold statue, then I don't recognize what is.
Lion is a film split in two, just as much as its injured lead character. The first and more critical segment is set in 1980s India, in which a five-year-old kid from a poor town winds up bolted on a void prepare. Days after the fact, he's spat out at the Kolkata railroad station, alone, apprehensive and not able to talk the neighborhoodhttp://www.gtactix.com/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=10835;sa=summary dialect.
His road smarts kick in, and he stays away from predators and degenerates; until he's rushed into the arms of new parents, the road scenes have a patina of dread for the most part felt in a survival thriller. Indeed, even the relative quiet of a shelter is a waking bad dream, as Saroo is encompassed by mentally harmed youngsters and overburdened social laborers.
The desert spring of Tasmania and rich guardians (Nicole Kidman and David Wenham) is just brief. He appears to acknowledge that his prior, cheerful life is basically lost, and adjusts to change far superior than his embraced sibling, another protected Indian road kid.
Be that as it may, in the end the hurt will return with full drive. "I'm lost," Dev Patel's more seasoned Saroo concedes, tasting a jalebi at a gathering and encountering a surge of recollections that would make Marcel Proust redden.
Saroo can't abandon reconnecting with his family, despite the fact that administration offices have disclosed to him it's an acts of futility. (There isn't much data to go on and nobody can appear to discover his town.
We'll later discover he's misspeaking it. He was just five!) In the time of machines and this modern program called Google Earth, most likely he can accomplish something.
He has the picture of the station and encompassing water tower smoldered in his psyche, and a little math offers general, though endless, outskirts inside which to seek.
Presently all he needs is assurance. Obviously the more engaged he turns into, the more he dismisses his better half (Rooney Mara) and his mom. This relationship is the most interesting (prepared those hankies!) as he should keep his venture mystery; he couldn't stand to offend her.
The greater part of this deduces in a parade of self-contradicting tears (the motion picture wouldn't exist generally), and chief Garth Davis doesn't pull his punches when the pivotal turning points come. It isn't simply schmaltz, however. It takes a clearness of vision and gigantic inventiveness to make mouse-clicking true to life.
These are augmented successions of cooperative symbolism, an uncommon extend of non-verbal moviemaking for something so populist. The second 50% of the film doesn't strike an indistinguishable harmony of promptness from the to begin with, however it pleasantly reflects mid 20s apprehension with youth uneasiness.
Lion is a champion in the current year's Oscar picks for its irregularity in-the-throat heave alone. Its nearest cousin is most likely Manchester by the Ocean, yet Kenneth Lonergan's film (likewise radiant) floats with a family so battered by catastrophe it can never reconnect. Lion doesn't surrender so effectively.
Space explorers wear grown-up diapers under their suits on the off chance that they have to pee or crap on spacewalks, however what happens if there's a crisis and they need to remain in their suit for a few days? That was the question Nasa postured to individuals from people in general in its Space Crap Challenge, and the victors of the challenge have quite recently been reported.
Nasa welcomed individuals to submit outlines for a framework that could gather human waste – excrement, pee and menstrual liquid – for up to six days, directing it far from the body without the utilization of hands. Basically it needed to work in microgravity, where solids, liquids and gasses ordinarily drift.
"Spaceflight is not generally charming," said Nasa space explorer Rick Mastracchio in a video reporting the challenge. "Individuals need to go the restroom even in a shuttle. How is this waste treated with the end goal that it doesn't hurt the space traveler or even execute them? Sufficiently given time, disease or even sepsis can set in."
The triumphant thought, granted $15,000 of the $30,000 prize pot, was put together via aviation based armed forces officer, flight specialist and family hone doctor Thatcher Cardon.
He drew on his involvement with keyhole surgery to think of a little airtight chamber in the crotch range of the suit, with an assortment of things including bedpans and diapers that could be embedded through a little gap and extended.
"That is to say, they can even supplant heart valves now through catheters in a conduit. So it ought to have the capacity to deal with a tad bit of crap!" he told NPR.
Such a waste administration framework is an important safety measure as Nasa sends individuals past the low-Earth circle of the Worldwide Space Station – for instance to the moon or Mars.
"Presently Nasa is going past low-Earth circle into lunar circle and past, we need to make sense of approaches to keep space travelers alive and solid for a long time after a noteworthy glitch, for example, loss of vehicle weight," Mastracchio said.
He portrayed a situation where the rocket has a specialized issue that causes lost compartment pressurization. "The team should rapidly put on their space suits to shield themselves from the vacuum of space."
Second place and $10,000 went to a group of three from Houston, made up of specialist Tony Gonzales, dental practitioner Katherine Family and College of Houston designing educator Stacey Louie. They created something many refer to as an "air-push urinary support", which utilizes air to push pee or menstrual waste down and through a leave tube.
His group said the outline could likewise have applications on Earth."I think it could be utilized as a part of doctor's facility settings, nursing homes ... anyplace where incontinence is an issue," group commander Gonzales told the Gatekeeper.
English creator Hugo Shelley came in third, winning $5,000 with his catheter-based outline ("It's an outside catheter; attempting to embed an interior catheter would be terribly distressing to do in space," he told the Gatekeeper), consolidated with a component for compacting, fixing and disinfecting strong waste and putting away it in the back of the suit.
At the point when he's not building waste administration frameworks for space explorers, Shelley creates electronic traps for mystical performers and assembles item models for new companies.
His proposed configuration utilizes gadgets and mechanical components to move fluids and gasses. "In microgravity you need to depend on fine activity, pumps or fans. That is the thing that the bigger waste transfer frameworks [on the spacecraft] utilize. Some portion of the outline takes components of that and scales down it."
Nasa will now consolidate components of the thoughts into models that may in the long run be tried on board the Worldwide Space Station.
"It may be the nearest I ever get to being in space," Shelley said. "In spite of the fact that despite everything I haven't surrendered any expectation of being a space explorer."
Andrew Newman dependably pays his duties, regardless of the possibility that he detests what the legislature is doing with them. Yet, not this year. For him, Donald Trump is the dealbreaker. He'll pay his city and state imposes however will decline to pay government wage assess as a cry of common defiance against the president and his new organization.
Newman is not the only one. A beginning development has been recognized to restore the fame of expense resistance – last observed as a group in America amid the Vietnam war yet which has been, sporadically, a convention in the US and past backpedaling numerous hundreds of years.
"My duty cash will go towards setting up a divider on the Mexican outskirt as opposed to sicking individuals. It will add to the pulverization of nature and perhaps more atomic weapons.
I think there will be a redistribution of riches from the white collar class to the well off tip top and Trump's battle for the working man and lady was a flat out extortion.
On the off chance that you pay charges you are involved in the framework," said Newman, a partner teacher of English and history at Stony Stream College on Long Island, some portion of the State College of New York.
"The administration needs our cash and if many people were pondering this sort of serene challenge, it would stand out enough to be noticed," he included.
Newman, 48, laments that his 2016 expenses have as of now been naturally removed from his paycheck. He expects to keep in touch with the legislature blaming the Trump organization for an arranged abuse of those open assets. At that point he will change his 2017 plans with the goal that he will get a bill from the Interior Income Benefit, rather, and will decline to pay it, giving the cash to causes he considers all the more socially mindful.
He will take after the case of one of his saints, Henry David Thoreau, who declined to pay assess that would finance wars and bondage and was imprisoned for it in 1846, and whose well known exposition, Common Insubordination, Newman frequently peruses to his understudies. Martin Luther Ruler Jr was an enormous admirer or Thoreau's contention about common insubordination, and Mahatma Gandhi drove salt duty challenges and resistance that prodded autonomy for India.
"I've been talking about this with companions and associateshttp://designspiration.net/sapfioriapps/ and they are to a great degree intrigued," he said. "Individuals are exceptionally responsive yet they likewise say 'I would prefer not to go to imprison.'"
He is significantly more probable essentially to be fined and charged enthusiasm on the unpaid assessments by the IRS.
"There have been not very many individuals who have invested energy in prison for not paying assessments as an express demonstration of political resistance," said Ruth Benn, facilitator of the National War Impose Resistance Planning Panel, a crusade gathering that energizes government charge blacklists for the sake of peace and prompts subjects on the best way to go about it.
A handout from the National War Assess Resistance Planning Board.
Facebook Twitter Pinterest
A handout from the National War Assess Resistance Planning Board.
The board of trustees was made in 1982, around the time Benn quit paying her government salary charge, as a challenge against the atomic weapons contest amid the frosty war.
"I've never been prosecuted," she said. IRS specialists have scrutinized her several circumstances, most as of late in 2009, saying she owed $40,000 in back expenses. They once took a little measure of cash from her ledger, she stated, however the outcomes have been few – however IRS letters in her post box still "place fear in my heart", she said.
Indeed, even after the frosty war, Benn has kept up her activity on account of what she sees as abundance spending on the military – which Trump has promised to help – and additionally the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the militarization of the police.
Benn said eagerness for duty resistance gave off an impression of being developing in the Trump time, however warily. Visits to the board of trustees' simple site have multiplied as of late to around 1,500 a day. The advisory group gauges that around 8,000 individuals a year decline to pay US government wage charge as a demonstration of common noncompliance, and that number is required to rise.
Among well known countenances, Mia Farrow has tweeted about expense resistance. Gloria Steinem is likewise wanting to participate in the development.
In an email to the Watchman, Steinem stated: "In 1968, we declined to pay the 10% of our Government pay assess dollars that financed the war in Vietnam, and incorporated a letter to the IRS saying as much. In February before duty time on Walk 15, 500 or so of us recorded our names in promotions that we distributed in the New York Times, together with a quote [from] Thoreau on Common Rebellion, and a welcome to go along with us."
She included: "will do this again by sending what I think ought to go to Arranged Parenthood, deducting it from my Government IRS return, and including a letter saying as much. Despite the fact that it's a littler total than Vietnam, we won't simply be keeping it or utilizing some to pay for costly NYT promotions, and can include whatever each of us can so as to bolster Arranged Parenthood."
Against Trump arouses are being arranged across the nation for 15 April, which is ordinarily charge day, despite the fact that this year profits are expected for 18 April. The topic will be to request that the president discharge his government impose records, something he has unfalteringly declined to do.
Kirsten Taylor, 50, a contemporary expressions pledge drive in Fabulous Rapids, Michigan, is particularly on edge to see Donald Trump's assessment forms.
"I'm not by any means a political dissident however I feel like Trump's expenses are his kryptonite. I need a battle of non-installment in the style of 'I'll demonstrate to you mine when you demonstrate to me yours'. I'm urgent for somebody to make sense of an approach to motivate him to unveil his profits. I think they would indicate he ought not be president."
Taylor is energetic about declining to pay government salary charge until Trump discharges his profits – however is right now undecided about whether she can bear the cost of it, with two youngsters in school requiring her support, she said.
"In the event that a well off advocate could stand to pay individuals' fines and legitimate costs, that would flabbergast," she stated, refering to the case of the dynamic narrative creator Michael Moore offering to pay any fines for Republican individuals from the constituent school who might consent to vote against Trump.
Robinson, a New York writer in her late 20s who favored not to share her full personality in view of dread of repercussions from her present business, has found a valuable escape clause.
As a craftsman, she can make her own particular organization into which she is paid as an essayist and after that pays out her own compensation, benefits subsidize commitments, operator's expenses and so forth.
Not long after Trump was chosen, Robinson sat down with her bookkeeper and talked about lawful approaches to pay irrelevant government salary impose, rather making additional installments into her assessment conceded benefits plan and as yet paying her neighborhood and state charges and Medicaid and Medicare commitments.
"This is my method for saying to Trump: you believe you're the special case who knows how to utilize the expense laws further bolstering your good fortune?" she said.
The Quakers still can't seem to toss their weight behind the new flood of enthusiasm, in spite of formally encouraging the boycotting of government assessments amid the Vietnam war and upholding charge resistance as a conservative technique amid their seventeenth century beginnings, in both England and America.
In the interim, there is discussion in California of the state turning into a "sorted out non-payer" of its duty to the national government and encouraging resistance with the elected expense code if Trump slices off elected financing to its "asylum urban communities" – Los Angeles, San Francisco and Sacramento – on the off chance that they don't participate with requests to hand over undocumented foreigners.
However Man of honor's Assention isn't all shy. There is an awesome scene toward the end where Dave tranquilly stands up to Kathy about her inability to talk up when one of her brilliant supper party visitors made a joke about a "kike".
Sorrowful Kathy had anticipated that Dave would compliment her on her traditionalist disapproved of radicalism basically in light of the fact that she felt terrible about it subsequently.
Coolly, with an insight of steel, Dave demands she spell out what the joke was and how she neglected to hold fast – in light of the fact that each time some awful split passes unchallenged, the powers of dogmatism accumulate quality for greater arrangements.
It's an incredible minute for Garfield, and still a stirring scene. For every one of its blames, Noble man's Assention is an intense, decent, intriguing individual from the best picture club.
Be that as it may, a few people will undoubtedly get the collywobbleshttps://whatissapfiori.dreamwidth.org/profile when they take a gander at Randy Kehler. He burned through 10 weeks in a province imprison in Massachusetts in the mid 1990s following quite a while of openly declining to pay charges in dissent at war spending (he likewise burned through 22 months in government jail for declining to collaborate with the Vietnam war draft).
In 1989, the feds had attempted to grab his home. In a long fight in court, he wound up in a correctional facility, just getting out when the experts at last sold his and his significant other's home.
"However, companions assembled us a superior one and we've lived in it from that point onward," he said.
Kehler said it was difficult to predict what impact a mass expense resistance would have on the Trump organization.
"In case you're sitting tight for an ensured result, you could hold up quite a while. In any case, it is all piece of a mass of demonstrations of heart by standard individuals that is critical. Go do it. You're very far-fetched to wind up in prison like me," he said.
In the opening to his 1962 New Yorker paper Letter from a District in My Psyche, James Baldwin strolled around his neighborhood of Harlem as a 14-year-old, thinking about whether his destiny would trap him there.
"What I saw around me that mid year in Harlem was what I had dependably observed," he composed. "Nothing had changed." Over 60 years on, Baldwin's words and theory have voyage a huge number of miles from 110th road.
His open picture has been on a voyage, from artistic sensation with his introduction novel Go Let it know on the Mountain in 1952 to his burning genuine work in the 60s that saw him venerated as one of America's most unmistakable open intelligent people.
A long time since he passed on of stomach tumor in 1987, an expat in the south of France, there is reinvigorated enthusiasm for Baldwin and his thoughts.
February sees the arrival of I Am Not Your Negro, a narrative by Haitian chief Raoul Peck that takes Baldwin's last, incomplete venture – a book about the lives and murders of his companions Malcolm X, Martin Luther Lord and Medgar Evers – as a beginning stage, before breaking down Baldwin's occasionally strained and troublesome association with the social liberties development. In Spring, Taschen will distribute an uncommon version of The Fire Next Time with pictures from Life magazine photographic artist Steve Schapiro.
Peck's film is the most recent in a series of occasions and reviews that have returned Baldwin in the general population creative ability. The ball started coming in 2014 with Columbia College's year-long program pegged to his 90th birthday. From that point forward, there have been film celebrations, shows committed to Baldwin, and melodic theater enlivened by his written work.
As the Dark Lives Matter dissents unfurled around the US, there was an accumulation of composing – including a passage from the Pulitzer champ Isabel Wilkerson – which took motivation from Baldwin. His work has been utilized to disclose everything from Trump to Dylann Rooftop and the Charleston church shooting.
At that point, in 2015, came Ta-Nehisi Coates' hit turned must-read critique on contemporary race relations in America, Between The World And Me, which was roused by Baldwin's own article gathering, The Fire Next Time.
For Baldwin researcher, teacher of English at Yale and creator Caryl Phillips, the arrival of Baldwin to standard deduction isn't astounding in any way. For him the huge issues concerning American life now – the ascent of rough, racially charged governmental issues, killings of unarmed dark men by the police, an emotionless open – rehash a history from which Baldwin's investigates still offer some comfort.
"Individuals are searching for somebody who can verbalize these issues," says Phillips. "I think the individual who has likely verbalized being an American and being dark, with more persuasiveness than any other person in the most recent century, is Baldwin."
For Peck, Baldwin's written work has kept going on the grounds that it was so comparatively radical. It looked past the twofold racial legislative issues of 60s America, toward a future that could really be called post-racial.
"He generally composes from the perspective that was politically appropriate, as well as from a humanistic perspective – it was never pretty much race for him."
Phillips concurs: "It would have satisfied him enormously to see Obama in the White House. He's a man who leaves what Baldwin would have perceived as the genuine pot of American life, which is combination and hybridity.
Individuals meeting up from various foundations to make another nation. That is the thing that he was stating, and that didn't run over well with the ungainly racialised governmental issues of the circumstances."
"He had the more drawn out view," says Peck. "It was about the legacy."That legacy is what's at the heart of Peck's narrative. He painstakingly shows how Baldwin is still applicable to contemporary America.
By exchanging high contrast film of dissents from the 60s into shading, and contemporary shading film from Ferguson into high contrast, Peck makes those occasions compatible.
Those pictures, consolidated with Baldwin's words perused by Samuel L Jackson, confirm Baldwin's status as a visionary author, as well as a rationalist we can even now swing to.
Amid a period when police shootings of unarmed dark men and ladies are under the magnifying instrument, Baldwin's expounding on the production of "the nigger" as an approach to legitimize the enslavement of African-America still feels pertinent.
His hypothesis that isolation of both physical and mental spaces is America's greatest obstacle seems to be valid with parallel, unequal frameworks created along racial lines – for lodging, religion and instruction – is still on the national motivation.
Baldwin, a gay dark man expounding on interracial connections in the 50s, grappled with character legislative issues when intersectionality was a word the vast majority would think alluded to the thruway code.
Peck needed to show how Baldwin fits impeccably into contemporary life. "[I needed to] remind individuals that this man has given all of us the instruments we require as of now, and, associating it to Ferguson, which was going on when I was dealing with the film, it resembled history making up for lost time with the film. My goal was to convey his work to the cutting edge once more. It was never expected to be a verifiable piece."
Yet, some time ago Baldwin was savaged by his associates, freely assaulted by the more aggressor dark pioneers of the time, among them Eldridge Knife (whose feedback was dribbling in homophobia) and Amiri Barakahttp://www.planet3dnow.de/vbulletin/members/114875-sapfioriapps, who saw his integrationist position as traded off and frail. Distributers and editors wouldn't touch him, either.
Time magazine turned down his offer of a discussion with Josephine Bread cook since he was viewed as old cap, and I Am Not Your Negro's beginning stage is Baldwin's proceeded with battles to get his work distributed following quite a while of poor surveys and decreasing deals.
That untouchable status, both at the season of the social liberties battle and in the dusk of his profession are, for Phillips, what make Baldwin immortal. He went for broke, and history has compensated him for it.
"The way that he figured out how to accomplish what he did – to continue distributing, to continue composing, to continue talking, to not [succumb] to the weight to wind up distinctly only a vocal representative and a hip reverberate chamber for the most mainstream position of the day, is a striking accomplishment."
Dissimilar to his companions who took a hardline position –, for example, Malcolm X's by-any-methods fundamental position, and the Dark Jaguars militancy – and offered arrangements, Phillips contends, Baldwin's occupation was to hold up under witness.
He read between the lines and endeavored to comprehend the world. "He investigates the ambiguities and the incongruities of the circumstance and helps you to see the issues all the more actually and unmistakably, and after that surrenders it over to you to make the determinations.
"I think when you're more youthful and you're attempting to discover answers, I don't think Baldwin is the individual you go to. I think when you perceive and you get to be distinctly mindful of the unpredictability of the issue, then you need to go to somebody who explains the many-sided quality and is set up to rest with vagueness." For Peck, Baldwin hasn't been such a great amount out of mold as a steady, uncited impact on essayists.
"Ten or 12 years prior, I said it was an ideal opportunity to backpedal to him since he had turned out to be some way or another overlooked," he says. "Individuals didn't perceive how imperative regardless he is. There was another era that was essentially utilizing him, and the learning of his work, however without giving him credit."
All connections are based on an establishment of trust. Donald Trump trusts Sean Spicer to be unendingly furious and befuddled, similar to a goliath little child caught in a corridor of mirrors, since that is, clearly, what he needs.
Wharfs Morgan trusts everybody on Twitter to shout mishandle at him throughout the day, since that is the main way he gets the opportunity to experience human feeling any more. Furthermore, less open yet similarly as imperative, I believe my better half not to watch scenes of Orange A major trend Dark in the face of my good faith.
Since that is the total core of our relationship. What's more, most likely yours, as well. Amongst work and child rearing, the time we get with each other is valuable and transient.
In case will watch a television arrangement, will do it together. Will encounter every one of the highs and lows and wanders aimlessly together, as a couple, and by no means are we permitted to charge off all alone and desert the other.
But then this happens. A review from the spilling organization proposes that an expanding number of us enjoy "Netflix deceiving". We are all sneaking off in the face of our accomplice's good faith to stream an unlawful solo scene of an arrangement we had guaranteed to share.
The review says that about portion of American supporters have swindled like this before, and it regularly causes a contention.
Netflix duping is fundamentally a monstrous flipside to Netflix and Chill, where all the transient delight of sex is supplanted by agonizing strain and nightmarish retaliations.
In my folks' day, you couldn't Netflix cheat, since TV projects were basically on when they were on. In the event that you missed a scene of Dallas, you would have missed it for ever. You would need to go whatever is left of your existence without knowing who shot JR.
It's a think about how anybody figured out how to complete anything that kind of weight hanging over them. Presently, however, since everything is accessible at the same time, it's a genuine trial of good fiber for individuals to watch at a concurred pace.
You can comprehend why Netflix bamboozling causes such a large number of battles. It's an essential manhandle of trust. On the off chance that you have concurred that you will observe each new scene of an arrangement together, just to crevasse yourself when your accomplice rests until tomorrow, it's difficult to tell what else you are able to do. Your motivation control is obviously impacted to bits.
You likely have a mystery chocolate stash in a pantry some place, isn't that right? You are most likely taking part in an extramarital entanglements with a neighbor. You likely crawl out of your home at the dead of night and rent your kids to bootleg market organ collectors, isn't that right?
As far as anyone is concerned, my significant other has never Netflix undermined me. I have run all the essential checks – I have signed into her record and checked her "Keep Watching" submenu to check whether she has been sneaking in scenes of The OA on the wily. Some of the time I will even read online spoilers of scenes I still can't seem to see, just to attempt to catch her out.
"What might happen to that winged serpent," I'll solicit toward the end from Round of Royal positions, then output her face to check whether she realizes that it will explode a sheep or whatever. On the off chance that I were ever to perceive any of those signs, that would be it for us. I'd stuff every one of her things in a canister sack and heave them out on to the road. We basically couldn't make due with a treachery of that seriousness.
Fortunately, we have correspondence to support us. We both realize that, if both of us are enticed to steam ahead with Place of Cards alone, the best thing we can do is be forthright about it. "I have to recognize what happens to Straight to the point," we'll say, "yet I can't on account of you're in doctor's facility having that operation." And, from that point, we can construct a structure where we can both watch the following scene autonomously of each other, never talk about it, and after that return and appreciate whatever remains of the arrangement together.
We additionally have a grip of go down demonstrates that are only for us. At the point when things get truly awful, these shows are our methadone. Indeed, our bodies are instructing us to furrow on and eat up the More unusual Things finale, yet our heads stay cool.
Our heads disclose to us this is a prime chance to watch Satire Blast, in light of the fact that our significant other abhors it and we are compelled to watch only it like some kind of ridiculous outsider at any rate.
This trust is the very establishment of our relationship. We know how wrong Netflix deceiving is. We could never stoop to the profundities of setting up another record for our child – apparently in light of the fact that we don't need our finely curated seeing calculation to be angry with a stormy evening Timmy Time session – absolutely so we can utilize it to watch The Crown without the other one constantly discovering. All things consideredhttps://www.apsense.com/user/whatissapfiori, my significant other wouldn't. Apologies, spouse. I didn't need you to discover along these lines.
No comments:
Post a Comment